Blogg

Käyttäjän Karine Hirn kuva
2012-05-15 (Comments)

I might have high stress tolerance, but if there is one job in the world I would not like to have (and anyway will never get) it would be to decide on Chinese macro-economic and financial policy.


How to measure and fine-tune growth in a country with the size and diversity of a continent? Here in Guanxi Province, southern China. Photo: Karine Hirn

There is of course hardly anyone deciding alone in any country, and even less in China, where the CCP strives to keep a team-approach based on consensus and dislikes seeing someone taking too much public space (Bo Xilai recently got a brutal reminder of this). But at the end of the day, there are people that make the decisions, based on lengthy considerations and discussions. Since October last year, they have been very much involved in fine tuning the Chinese economy, and it’s not an easy task. And let’s put yourself in their shoes for a short while….

First of all you need to have good and reliable data. Here the data collection poses a large problem as local authorities have historically both inflated and deflated their figures to stick to their planned targets and to help local bureaucrats’ careers as they often are being judged based on economic growth in their localities. Since February this year data from 700,000 companies nationwide is submitted through the Internet in a move to avoid interference from the different government levels that used to be involved in the data collection.

Even without the obstruction of local authorities, data collection in a country with over 1.3 billion inhabitants and hundreds of thousands companies is complicated. The reality is very different from one province to another as well. Still, Chinese statistics have improved tremendously compared with 20 years ago, but there are outstanding problems inherent in the data. Personally I am puzzled to see how monthly or quarterly macro indicators can be gathered and compiled in such a short time from such an enormous country.

Once you have the data however accurate it is, you will not have much time to think about it as it must be released as soon as possible to avoid leaks, insider information and other abuses. Disclosure rules have lately been made stricter to fight against the problem and recently some people were actually sentenced to prison for leaking the inflation figures to media last year.

Once the data is out, it will travel across the globe at the speed of light. Now that China has become the second largest economy in the world, you can of course expect that analysts should care as such, but the main reason all eyes are on Beijing when the figures are released is that the world’s largest exporter and the world’s largest consumer of a long series of commodities and goods actually has a profound impact on an ever-increasing list of sectors and countries.

China has lots of its own problems to address but its growth strength is still expected to be the one to save the world when the US and Europe struggle so hard with their debts and weak demand. Lot of people observing the data does not necessarily mean that they will draw the right conclusions. For instance the current electricity consumption slow-down might be partly explained by better energy efficiency, increasing weight of the service sector and also declining fixed asset investment growth; and not necessarily mean that Chinese growth stalls.

Anyway, what do you do with the readings? You have a five-year plan to follow and even longer term strategic goals to complete (energy shortage, agriculture inefficiency, demographic challenges, environmental disaster to name a few, voluntarily omitting the social and political challenges), but you are constantly under pressure about the short-term tactics.

The data-points are numerous and sometimes contradictory. If they are too weak you will get pressure to release the brake and stimulate growth, because even unbalanced and unsustainable growth provides lots of wealth opportunities to a few powerful people, companies, and authorities, but risks to make the economy overheat. If they are too strong, you will get pressure to keep tightening in an environment where parts of the economy you would actually want to boost for instance the SMEs that provide lot of jobs are already suffering from over-tightening.

And during this time, you might not care so much about it but you do create huge excitement within the financial community of the whole world, including offshore hedge funds thirsty for bad news or long only investors that want their forecasts to be achieved, and even more so the Chinese financial community (that loves the exercise of second guessing policy-makers and making a big fuss about nothing). Stock indices are moving, currencies are impacted, and so are your government’s holdings and currency reserves of course. 

Fine tuning the Chinese economy is not an easy job….

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: The job of fine-tuning the Chinese economy
Käyttäjän Marcus Svedberg kuva
2012-05-08 (Comments)

A number of EU leaders have announced that they are not going to attend the inauguration of the Euro 2012 football tournament or any of the matched hosted by Ukraine. The background is the imprisonment and reported maltreatment of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.

The EU protested already when Tymoshenko was sentenced to seven years on corruption charges, arguing that the trial was politically motivated, and her deteriorating health conditions have caused strong reactions from leaders across the union.

The Ukrainian government has responded that this resembles cold war tactics and it has given rise to a discussion about the links between sports and politics. The Economist argued this week that political leaders but not the football teams should boycott the matches in Ukraine (the tournament is co-hosted by Poland). I personally agree with that line of reasoning as does a majority of those that have participated in an online vote on the Economist website.

The idea behind such a line of thought is that footballers and sports more generally should not be punished for having a regime that does not respect the rule of law. But it is, at the same time, important to send a message that Europe does not accept such practice.

The not so subtle message sent to the Ukrainian government in general and President Yanukovych in particular is one of isolation. Hosting the football tournament was supposed to be a great triumph – and it may still be one for the Ukrainian football team – but for Yanukovych it is starting to become more of an embarrassment.

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: fotbal, Sports, Ukraine
Käyttäjän Marcus Svedberg kuva
2012-04-26 (Comments)

One of the most persistent discount factors on Russia is demographics. The fact that the population used to decrease by 0.5% per year, which led to forecasts that the population would fall to 125mn by 2025, is still on top of many people’s mind when thinking about Russia. It has caused people to suggest that Russia should not be part of the BRICs – even though the inventor of the acronym has argued against that claim – and that Russia has a huge employment challenge.

 

Source: Troika, State Statistics Service
 
Now, things have changed since 2004 when these overly bearish forecasts were made. An optimistic forecast made in 2010 suggests that the population will be around 147mn in 2025, which is roughly the same as in 2000. These long-term forecasts are very uncertain and it is fair to argue that demographics remains a problem in Russia but the negative trend has been broken and there are reasons to be optimistic.
 
Life expectancy is still not great in Russia but has increased from the record low noted in the early 00s. It has on average increased by 5 years to 63 for men and 75 for women.   
 

Source: Troika, State Statistics Service
 
The Russian population is still shrinking but the rate of decline has decelerated from more than 0.5% per year to around 0.1%. The reason is more births and that Russians are living longer. The Russian population actually grew by 100 000 people in 2011 with the difference being made up of official net (labor) immigration.  


Source: Troika, State Statistics Service

The positive changes have already caused the economically active population to increase, after a slump in the 00s following the negative demographics in the 90s, and this trend is expected to continue.
 


Source: Troika, State Statistics Service
 

Russia has not yet overcome its demographic challenge but it is fair to argue that things are going in the right direction. The underlying reason behind the positive development is probably that the standard of living has improved dramatically since the early 90s and that Russians have a more positive outlook today. The 90s was very hard on Russia while the 00s has been very good from an economic perspective. The Russian economy is ten times larger today compared with 2000 and the country has moved up significantly on various socio-economic indices while poverty has fallen sharply. UNDP’s broad human development index and the sub index on health capture the progress quite well.


Source: UNDP

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: Russian Demographics
Käyttäjän Kristina Sandklef kuva
2012-04-11 (Comments)

Yesterday, official Chinese media reported that Bo Xilai has been stripped of his posts within the Communist Party, including his posts in the Central Committee and the Political Bureau of the Central Committee.

Also, his wife Gu Kailai is now under investigation for murder regarding British citizen Neil Heywood, a friend of the Bo family who helped their son to enter Harrow, and that was found dead in a hotel room in Chongqing last November.

The last two months, since Bo’s former ally and police chief in Chongqing Wang Lijun showed up at the US consulate in Chengdu trying to seek political asylum (see previous posting), I have followed the Bo Xilai saga turn into a thriller of greed, corruption, and murder. In fact, it has reminded me a lot of the corruption scandal in 1995 when the vice mayor of Beijing died under strange circumstances and the mayor of Beijing was sentenced to 16 years in prison for corruption. That story ended up in a fiction book called “Wrath of heaven”, which was banned in China soon after its publishing.

I am now eagerly waiting for “Wrath of Heaven part 2: Red Chongqing”. One lesson from the corruption scandal in Beijing was that rather than focusing on political infighting, which it was, it focused on individuals’ corruption and murder. Similarly, the party tries to mend its image now by focusing on the Bo family’s alleged corruption and involvement in a murder, rather than discussing neo Cultural Revolution political thoughts and exposing political rifts within the party. 

I am sometimes asked why we should care about what is happening to Bo Xilai and what importance it has for us investors. First of all, I think we should definitely care about what is happening in China now as it is part of having your own personal China strategy to better understand an emerging China. Even if the ousting of Bo is not unique in the history of the Communist Party of China, it is interesting to note that it has been a fast ousting.

It is less than a month since he was removed as party secretary of Chongqing (see previous posting) and since then China has been rifted by rumours including a military coup to liberate Bo that were quickly spread on weibo (the “Chinese Twitter”)  resulting in weibo comments function being closed for some days last week. It is likely that rumours on weibo, where the Bo saga has been intensely discussed (despite Bo Xilai being a blocked word), has made the Communist Party act faster than it would have done otherwise.

Bo has been replaced by a person who belongs to the same faction as himself as part of the carefully balanced coalition that exists within the party; and his dismissal probably has more to do with his charismatic personality and the corruption charges than his true fascination of reviving the Cultural Revolution and promoting state owned enterprises. However   it shows that there is no room for neo Cultural revolutionary philosophy in Chinese politics today. With Bo Xilai gone, it will be easier to pursue crucial economic reforms needed to avoid falling into the middle income trap, as being described in the World Bank report earlier in March (see previous posting). A China passing the middle income trap will have global impacts in all economic spheres.

Similarly, with Bo gone, it is possible that there could be more new leaders from the Hu Jintao/Wen Jiabao camp coming into the next Standing Committee of the Politbureau. What the party needs the least today is continued exposure of disunity within the party. This is likely one of the reasons why People’s Daily is running an editorial saying that everybody should be united behind the decision to strip Bo of his political posts and also why the Chinese news agency Xinhua published an article saying that “China is a socialist country ruled by law, there are no privileged living outside the law, and if you break the law you are to be punished”. 

For Bo’s allies, the near future could be tough. Already several officials and businessmen have been taken into custody for investigation. It is likely that many of Bo’s friends are now distancing themselves from him in order to avoid charges and they will have to realign themselves with new patrons. It is also possible that some of the companies with leaders having good connections with the Bo family will face tougher times. 

Still, it is important to remember that we do not yet know what implications the fall of Bo will have. But one thing is for sure: this is not the last page in the Bo Xilai saga.

 

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: Bo Xilai
Käyttäjän Karine Hirn kuva
2012-03-23 (Comments)

My recent trip to Taiwan gave me plenty of new perspectives. Coming from Shanghai, my first impressions on Taiwan (officially called the Republic of China or ROC), were - not surprisingly- those of a much richer place with better-off people, and also much less economic activity than its giant neighbor.

The Asian Tiger has good Japanese cars, less smokers, fewer bikes, and all motorbikers wearing a helmet on, fast (and totally free) Internet. Besides the construction of the massive new highway from the airport to Taipei, there is little building activity to be noticed on an island where the major infrastructures have been built long time ago at the time of the Japanese occupation during the first half of the 20th century as well as in the 50s when Chiang Kai-Shek launched some strategic projects to give a job to thousands of its followers from Mainland China, or thoroughly rebuilt after each earthquake and typhoon that regularly plague the island.

The trains are not modern, but work well. The roads are not brand new, but well-maintained. I could hardly see any significant residential project being built in Taipei or Taichung (another major city in the middle of the island). Except in the more industrial area of Taipei, I could also enjoy some blue sky and fresh air, which sadly are a rare thing in China, and in general a much “greener” environment where you see Taiwanese doing sports, wearing masks not to contaminate people around when they have a cold and sneeze (also something one would dearly wish for in China!) and focusing on organic food.


Caption: Chiang Kai Shek’s favorite lake, the Ri Yue Tan (Sun Moon Lake) looks like Alpine scenery

Some Taiwanese sites are so safe, clean and nice that one could think it is Japan or Switzerland. But the culture and traditions are so definitely Chinese. Moreover, learning about the recent history of Taiwan is like reading a captivating book about China’s history, political, economic and diplomatic development during the last 60 years.
The visit of the amazing National Palace Museum in Taipei that exposes the finest part of the collection of the Chinese dynasties that have been created by great masters during thousands of years gives also another angle on the level of sophistication the Chinese civilization had reached such a long time before the Western civilization did.

Taiwan has a fascinating history; and this history could be analyzed following the different foreign nations that controlled it (the Netherlands, Spain, France, Japan, China) or dissecting its past growth drivers. There was a time when camphor trees were the largest export product of the island, there was also a time when Taiwan had one of the world’ biggest production of sugar and tea, then when gold was discovered in 1890 in the north by railway workers cleaning their rice bowl in the river and the gold rush had a big impact on the economy until the second World War.
WW2 and Chiang Kai Shek’s arrival to Taipei together with 2 million people, including members of the business elite of China, clearly transformed the island into a military-focused island with martial law until 1987. Taiwan however became one of the Asian Tigers demonstrating outstanding economic growth in the 70s and 80s, largely based on ultra-competitive exports of textile, then electronics to Europe and to the US.

Taiwan has its own challenges. Nowadays the island is experiencing annual GDP growth of 3.5%-4%, which many could envy but which seems very shy in comparison with the 8-10% of its giant neighbor.
Mainland China is not only growing much faster but it is also taking jobs away (as Taiwanese workers’ monthly wages are what Chinese workers earn per year), taking FDIs away (many multinationals prefer to establish themselves on the other side of the strait as despite an improvement of the relations between the two countries there are still tensions in the air and trade restrictions) and also brains away.

Thousands of Taiwanese white-collars now work in China, I’ve met quite a few in Shanghai. Usually these are people that have studied in the US and decided to come to China, which offers more managerial and entrepreneurship opportunities. Another cloud in the horizon for Taiwan is the changes in the tech space where the local extremely important PC manufacturing industry might be threatened if they fail the technological shift.
But there are opportunities as well, of course.

First, a 4% GDP growth is still offering opportunities and domestic demand has improved. Chinese tourists – first allowed in groups in 2009 now even individual travelers since 2011 - are still subject to a daily arrival quota, but are very visible and active in the shopping centers and hotels. When they stop being obsessed about shopping these tourists will also certainly start to appreciate the beautiful natural sites of the island. The Taiwanese industry’s high-quality qualified workforce is also attractive as there is a lack of such in mainland China, often cited as an obstacle on China’s path to climb the value chain.

Several Taiwanese companies have been very successful doing business in China, for instance some retailers. The bio-tech sector is also part of the strategic agenda in Taipei. Interestingly, the great migration in 1949 of 2 million followers of Chiang-Kai-Shek from all over China means that the island’s genetic base is extremely broad hence suitable for clinical testing of drugs for the Chinese population.

The genetic base might be very broad but Taiwan itself gave the impression of having a homogeneous development. Of course, the countryside seems poorer than the cities but the contrast is not as huge as in China; and the cities themselves seem to have reached comparable levels of development. The economy is maturing, what will be the next impetus for growth? This week, Taiwan announced a liberalization of the restrictions for Chinese capital inflow, expanding the list of sectors and lifting the current 10% cap to 50% for key sectors. That is expected to boost the economy thanks to more M&A and FDI. Further along the line another trigger could well be the long-awaited and much-discussed ASEAN Free Trade Area, AFTA that will be implemented in 2015, triggering more trade in between Southeast Asian Nations.

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: Impressions from across the Strait, Karine Hirn, Taiwan
Käyttäjän Kristina Sandklef kuva
2012-03-15 (Comments)

Yesterday, at the annual press conference with Premier Wen Jiabao after the National People’s Congress (NPC) was closed, Premier Wen talked about the necessity to continue economic and political reforms to decrease income disparities and make growth more resilient.

As usual when Premier Wen talks about political reforms, he did not specify which reforms are needed. Instead he warned that if political reforms are not implemented the country could fall back into disorder similar to the Cultural Revolution.

The last phrase, Cultural Revolution, was an implicit criticism of Red Chongqing leader Bo Xilai who has been in troubles for several weeks since his former police chief, Wang Lijun, took refuge to the US consulate in Chengdu, apparently trying to defect (see previous posting) just days before Vice President Xi Jinping was due to go on his first official visit to the US. The Wang Lijun incident was probably as disturbing to the US as it was to China.

Wang Lijun appears to have ended up at the Ministry of State Security in Beijing and China watchers have followed Bo’s whereabouts closely ever since. Last week, Bo did not show up at the NPC on Thursday, and there were reports about suicides and arrests following the Wang incident, something that gave me flashbacks of Beijing 1995 when a similar scandal involving the Beijing vice mayor surfaced, which was the start of the Shanghai faction ousting the Beijing faction within the party.

Last Friday, Bo emerged again, blamed a cold for not being present at the NPC the day before and scolded foreign journalists for spreading false rumours about his son driving a red Ferrari and attending expensive schools in England and the US on corrupt money.

Today, Bo Xilai was sacked as party secretary in Chongqing and nobody really knows what will happen next, except that Bo’s future as a political leader in China is over. In best case, he will be investigated for poor personnel judgment hiring Wang Lijun as his assistant and then given some honorary post within the party.

In worst case he could face corruption charges and be sent to jail. That he was not fired before is likely due to the fact that at first there was the Xi trip to the US and then the NPC not to be disturbed. It is common practice in China to act like this; we witnessed a similar approach when the SARS epidemic was raging in Beijing together with loads of rumours making SMS traffic peak back in the spring of 2003.

The reasons why Bo was removed from his political positions in Chongqing are many. Some analysts say he was way too charismatic and thus posed a threat to the other contenders going for top leadership in Beijing this autumn and they used the Wang Lijun incident to oust him. Bo’s political campaigning in Chongqing trying to revive Cultural Revolution values by sending out red text messages to the inhabitants and making them sing old communist songs could have become too much to the more liberal leaders in Beijing.

What will happen next? Bo is replaced by Zhang Dejiang, currently Vice Premier, who has worked in provinces such as Jilin, Guangdong, and Zhejiang. He holds a degree in economics from the Kim Il-sung University in Pyongyang, where he studied in the late 1970s when the economic reforms in China were in its cradle. Apparently, he was in charge of the cover up of SARS in Guangdong in 2002, but appears to belong to the same faction as Bo Xilai, which means that he could be in for some damage control in Chongqing, but reforms are likely to continue in the city, though without the redness.

Some media have put forward Bo’s Chongqing model as being opposed to the Guangdong model represented by Wang Yang, and some even made the daring comparison of Chongqing being the North Korea model while Guangdong would be the Singapore model. I disagree with these comparisons even though the red songs coming from Chongqing did indeed remind me of the Cultural Revolution, which I believe few Chinese actually would like to return to.

Even if the new leader of Chongqing has a North Korean connection and apparently is fluent in Korean, it is unlikely that he will continue to pursue the return to old communism à la Cultural Revolution. If we see what he has done in both Zhejiang and Guangdong, it appears that he is a reform oriented politician who favours economic growth first. Besides the redness of the Chongqing model, it appears to have been experimenting with some social security policies, which were already in place before Bo arrived (and when Wang Yang, ironically, was the party secretary of Chongqing).

So even if today was a big day in Chinese politics and one step forward to the political leadership transition this autumn, reminding me of the old child rhyme “Ten little Indians”, the Chinese politics once again shows that they will continue their reforms, but not in the “red” direction.

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: Ideological rifts within the party: Bo Xilai losing power
Käyttäjän Kristina Sandklef kuva
2012-03-13 (Comments)

Recently, China reported a record high trade deficit of USD 31.5 billion, which together with some statements from the governor of People’s Bank of China regarding the continuing appreciation of the Chinese yuan made some commentators speculate if now is the time for China to allow the yuan to freely float.

The answer to the last question is no, even if Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of People’s Bank of China, said that the market is playing a bigger role in deciding the exchange rate of the yuan and that the bank’s long term goal is to build a more market-based foreign exchange system. 

He also said that the yuan is now getting closer to its fair value against foreign currencies, something many commentators immediately linked to the record high trade surplus in February (and probably also made the Conservative president candidates in the US upset as they often talk about the Chinese currency manipulation in their campaigns).

But what does the record high trade deficit in February really mean? First of all, it is important to remember that as the Chinese New Year took place in January this year and in February last year, the year-on-year comparisons of the statistics for both January and February are skewed by seasonal factors.

For example, during Chinese New Year, most factories close down and both exports and imports are hence lower. After Chinese New Year, the factories usually import commodities, machinery, and parts needed for this year’s production, which makes imports go up.

This is exactly what happened in February, and as there were uncertainties for the new year in early January, many orders for commodities and parts were likely cancelled, which made imports fall -15.3% in January, only to surge to almost 40% in February.

If we instead study the combined monthly trade statistics of January and February, we see that the trade deficit is indeed there, but only USD 4.25 billion. Also, if comparing year-on-year, we can see that exports were up 6.9% in January and February and imports up with 7.7% compared with January and February 2011. Of course, it is easy to put all the blame on the Chinese New Year, but it does play a major role in the statistics these two months.

What is interesting to note is that as the Production Manager Index, PMI, is actually increasing, from 50.5 in January to 51 in February, this shows that despite a slowdown of trade, which is a fact judging from the trade statistics, Chinese managers still remains quite optimistic regarding its economic growth and orders.

But what about the Chinese yuan? When will it be free floating? Our view is that governor Zhou is showing the road, which is long to go before the Chinese yuan is totally free floating. As China has strict capital controls today, it will be hard for the nation to change this policy quickly without getting disruptions in capital in- and outflows.

We believe that China will continue to let its currency appreciate slowly. It could be that the Chinese yuan is getting closer to its equilibrium now, which would mean a slower appreciation. We also believe that the record high trade surplus in February was partly seasonal, but also affected by the slowing exports to Europe, in February exports to Europe declined with 1.1%, while imports from Europe remained stable.

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: China, trade deficit, yuan
Käyttäjän Kristina Sandklef kuva
2012-03-06 (Comments)

On Monday, Premier Wen Jiabao delivered the Chinese government’s Work Report at the opening of the annual National People’s Congress (NPC). The Work Report outlines the targets and policies to be implemented in China this year. The NPC will be going on for another week and we will likely get news everyday on new policies that have been put forward and approved.

As some might have noted, the Work Report lowered the growth target from 8 percent to 7,5 percent for 2012. This came as no surprise for us and other China watchers. For the entire Five Year Plan (2011-2015), growth target is set at 7 percent and a lower growth target rarely means that this will happen in reality.

For example, last year the growth target was 8 percent and growth still ended at 9,4 percent. Thus, we still expect economic growth to land at around 8-8,5 percent in 2012.

Instead, the Work Report’s targets should be seen as a message to local governments in China that the central government understands that the international financial crisis will affect the economic growth in the provinces and Beijing does not expect growth to be as high as last year.


A picture of China’s currently highest sky-scrapper, the Shanghai World Financial Center.
Photo: Elisa Hirn

The lower growth target also signals that Beijing is not going to implement a huge stimulus program as it did in 2008-2009 during the previous financial crisis. The logic is that if you set an attainable target it is easier to reach and this is also why the inflation target is 4 percent, rather than 3,5 percent, which is the figure most analysts believe will be the total inflation rate in 2012.

Other news so far from the NPC is that China will continue to improve its health care system, build more social housing, increase both its defense budget and its budget for internal security.  The defense budget will be increased by 11,2 percent to RMB  670.3 billion, which is a lower percentage increase than previous years.

The budget for internal security remains bigger than for the defense with RMB 701.8 billion, which many observers interpret as the Chinese being worried about social instability this year of leadership transition.

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: China, Kristina Sandklef
Käyttäjän Kristina Sandklef kuva
2012-03-01 (Comments)

Earlier this week, the World Bank released its report “China 2030: Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative High-Income Society”, which made the headlines in many media. The content of the report comes as no surprise to China watchers.

According to the World Bank, China now stands at a turning point after 30 years of economic reforms and rapid growth and needs new reforms in order to sustain its growth.

The changes suggested are to make structural reforms to strengthen the market economy in China including making state-owned enterprises more market oriented; increase the speed of innovation; develop a greener economy; provide social security for everybody; strengthen the fiscal system; and improve global economic relations. If China does not reform its economy the country risks to half its economic growth the next twenty years, according to the World Bank.

That China stands at a cross road and has to decide how to continue its way to growth is well known and only a year ago the 12th Five Year Plan (link to previous blog) outlined many ways on how to proceed. When it comes to reforms in China it is important to remember that reforms are usually gradual and do not happen overnight.

Often reforms are tested in small scale and if they are successful they will be implemented in all of China. This is how the reforms that started in 1979 began for example opening up special economic zones in some restricted areas for foreign trade. This is how a poor fishing village turned into a huge city like Shenzhen.

Another example is the household responsibility system, which is often put forward as the first and totally new step in the economic reforms as it revolutionized the collectivized countryside and improved productivity dramatically by allowing farmers to lease land and hold private plots rather than work in collective production teams.

This system was implemented on large scale in 1979, but had already been in use before: first in the late 1950s in areas resisting collectivization and then in early 1978 it reappeared again and set precedence in Anhui province to improve bad harvests.

  


Shenzhen has in 30 years become a major financial and business center. Here a picture taken today of Futian district, home to many headquarters and public buildings.

Today, we can see that China is experimenting in similar ways with potential reforms in different areas. For example, Guangdong province, together with some other provinces, is set to pursue a reform trying to scale down the official bureaucracy to create “a lean state and a great society” by crushing the so called iron rice bowl of life long bureaucratic employment. Already, this has been tried in Shenzhen successfully for two years.

Another reform that could be coming up is the progressive liberalization of the financial flows. The other day, the People’s Bank of China published a report calling for opening up of the capital account, and a rumor later refuted was spread that Shenzhen would allow people to transfer their money relatively freely to Hong Kong. Still, the debate on the issue means that something is going on and will happen.

Another example is a leak from a government official at the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology that electricity prices are to be adjusted for certain energy consuming industries in China. This is most likely another well needed reform that is starting to be implemented.

There are many challenges ahead for the Chinese economy if it is to continue to grow rapidly and the largest obstacles are vested interest groups that do not want to lose power. Another question is of course if China will listen to the World Bank’s recommendation.

Given the fact that one of the top economic research centers at the State Council actually contributed substantially to the report chances are quite good that adequate reforms will be carried out. After all, the main objective of the Chinese government is to create a modern, harmonious, and creative high-income society, and that can only be done by a continuous good economic growth.

(Comments) | Vapaa määrittely: China, Kristina Sandklef
Käyttäjän Marcus Svedberg kuva
2012-02-24 (Comments)

The big question ahead of the Russian presidential election next Sunday is not who will win but rather what the margin will be and, more importantly, what will happen after the election.  

Prime Minister Putin may not be as popular as he used to be or as liked as the official polling suggest, but he is nevertheless the most popular politician in Russia and the other candidates are trailing far behind the former president.

The latest Levada survey, which is the most trustworthy polling organization, gives Putin a 66% win, which means that he would win easily in the first round.  None of the other four candidates comes close to those levels with Communist leader Zyuganov and nationalist Zhirinovsky at distant second while the two other candidates, Just Russia leader Mironov and billionaire Prokhorov, trailing even further behind.

Putin’s popularity has fallen during the last couple of years and the street protests after the parliamentary election in December illustrate the growing discontent with the ruling elite, personified by Putin, among the urban middle class.

But it would be a mistake to assume that he has turned deeply unpopular or that some other politician has become more popular. Putin’s approval rating has dropped from an abnormally high 85% four years ago to a more normal 65% today, according to Levada.

The protests have not been unimportant though as they seem to have encouraged Putin to adopt a more reformist stand. He has been talking and writing about the need for reforms in the election run-up, which would be very positive for the economy and the stock market if implemented.

(Comments) |

Subscribe to blog posts

Enter your email address:

About this blog

Långsiktighet och lokal närvaro är grunden för East Capitals investeringsfilosofi. I den här bloggen vill vi dela med oss av aktuella insikter från Östeuropa & Kina och dess investeringsklimat. Engelska är gemensamt för de flesta av våra investerare och är därför det främsta språket för blogginläggen.

Bloggpolicy

East Capitals blogg är avsedd som en kontaktyta mellan webbplatsens besökare och företrädare för East Capital. Det är viktigt att uppmärksamma att uttalanden som görs av företrädarna för East Capital inte nödvändigtvis utgör East Capitals officiella ståndpunkt. Under inga omständigheter ska uttalanden på bloggen uppfattas som investeringsrådgivning och East Capital är inte ansvarigt för någon skada eller förlust som någon av webbplatsens besökare eller annan orsakas genom att förlita sig på uttalanden på bloggen.

Även om East Capital inte kontrollerar de kommentarer som skickas in av användarna, förbehåller sig East Capital rätten att avstå från att publicera, fördröja publicering av, ta bort, flytta eller redigera användarkommentarer till bloggen. East Capital accepterar inte kommentarer som är oförskämda, hotfulla eller förolämpande. Användarna ska avstå från att skicka in kommentarer som inte har med bloggens ämne att göra, innehåller reklam eller har ett olagligt innehåll, eller kommentarer som det kan anses utgöra ett brott att publicera (exempel på sådana brott är insiderbrott, otillbörlig marknadspåverkan och intrång i annans immateriella rättigheter).

Genom att skicka in en kommentar till bloggen ger du East Capital en rätt att använda kommentaren, helt eller delvis, i East Capitals marknadsföring eller på annats sätt, utan att ge dig någon ersättning.
Om du är av uppfattningen att en kommentar har publicerats på bloggen i strid med denna bloggpolicy ber vi dig att anmäla detta till: blog [at] eastcapital [dot] com

Our bloggers

  • Käyttäjän Karine Hirn kuva

    Founding partner and Chief Representative, Shanghai office. Karine blogs about East Capital, its investment products and gives direct reports from Shanghai.

  • Käyttäjän Marcus Svedberg kuva

    As East Capital's Chief Economist Marcus will focus on macro-economic issues, market events, research and political issues affecting the region.

  • Käyttäjän Vesna Lucca kuva

    As Head of Communications Vesna will focus on East Capital's business as well as the latest media topics.

  • Käyttäjän Kristina Sandklef kuva

    Kristina, Macro Economist Asia, will share her experience and report trends and issues within politics and economics affecting China.

Login