Blogginlägg med etiketten Russia

Marcus Svedbergs bild
2011-12-20 (Comments)

It took 18 and 14 years respectively but Russia has now signed the World Trade Organisation, WTO, accession treaty as well as the Central Depository Act, CDA. These events did not cause much attention but are important positive steps to improve the investment climate in Russia.

Russia negotiated with the WTO for 18 years and many analysts had given up on the issue, especially as the talks stalled over Georgia. Nevertheless a breakthrough was reached a few months ago as we have written about before (read more).

Russia now needs to ratify the treaty and is expected to become a formal member during the first half of 2012. The accession is believed to add 0.5 to 1 percentage of growth (GDP) per year through improvement in the investment climate over the longer term or roughly USD 160bn in total.

The benefits are likely to fall unevenly though with the coastal regions (Northwest, St Petersburg and the Far East) expected to reap the largest welfare gains through increased trade and investments.

The effects will also impact different sectors differently, some will gain from improved market access (metals and mining) and lower imports (consumer goods) whereas others could be hurt by increased competition (auto manufacturers, agriculture and financials). Other sectors, such as energy and utilities, could benefit indirectly through more efficient capex programs and tax structures. 

That President Medvedev signed the CDA after 14 years of deliberation was also a major step to improve the investment climate in Russia as it will make the market directly available to more investors (that until now have been restricted from buying local Russian shares).

The CDA is a first step to improve the liquidity on the market. The next step is to reduce the 25% threshold for foreign listings. Progress on the CDA is also part of a larger ambition to improve the investment climate in Russia and comes as the two main stock exchanges in Moscow are merging. Analysts expect lower costs and better liquidity after the Micex and RTS merger became a fact earlier this week.

Investors should welcome these changes as it will improve the investment climate in Russia. We acknowledge that there is still much to do – and implementation is key – and expect the reform momentum in this area to continue.

 

 

(Comments) | Taggar: CDA, Russia, WTO
Marcus Svedbergs bild
2011-12-13 (Comments)

Something did change the week after the parliamentary election in Russia on 4 December. The protests and vocal discontent with the ruling elite and Prime Minister Putin suddenly became a political force too strong to be easily dismissed by the Kremlin. The inevitable change in Russia will follow its own logic, but I dare to say that it has started.       

I have been arguing that the elections (parliamentary and presidential) would not change the political situation in Russia in any fundamental way in the short term but that the increasingly assertive middle class represent the best hope for real change in Russia in the medium term.

I was partly right because the formal political set-up has not changed (United Russia won a majority in the Duma and Putin is still expected to become President) and the middle class could now become an engine of change. But it all happened sooner than expected and something did change the week after the parliamentary election on 4 December. The protests and vocal discontent with the ruling elite in general and Prime Minister Putin in particular suddenly became a political force too strong to be easily dismissed or repressed by the Kremlin. 

This force has been described as urban, middle class, young, and frustrated with the ruling elite. All that is probably true but that is also where the easy categorization ends. There is no single organization or leadership but rather a mix of groups with different interests that have united through social networks on the internet based on what they don’t like.

It is therefore difficult to predict how this frustration will play out. But given the fact that the protests so far have been larger than expected and calmer than feared, there is reason to believe this force will not go away anytime soon. Indeed, new demonstrations are scheduled on 24 December.

This should be welcomed as it will put pressure for free and fair elections, more plurality and increased transparency. But given the absence of a single organization, leadership or ideology behind the protesters, it is difficult (although not impossible) to see how this force can challenge the current leadership.

Putin and United Russia are, after all, popular (albeit not as popular as the official election results suggest) among a large share of the Russian population after more than a decade of rapid economic growth and increased stability. Some of the leaders behind the protests have been suggested as potential rivals to Putin for the presidency and an oligarch announced his candidacy this week. More names may appear in the near future but I doubt anyone will have the capacity to unite the protesters and become a serious challenge to Putin in March. 

The political situation in Russia has become more complex and uncertain, but there is also reason to believe things will change for the better even though it is too soon to speculate exactly how things will evolve. In the meantime, I believe one should be careful in comparing this with the color revolutions in Eastern Europe or with the uprisings in the Middle East.

I believe the inevitable change in Russia will follow its own logic, but I dare to say that it has started.     
 
 

(Comments) | Taggar: election, parliamentar, presidential, putin, Russia, United Russia
Marcus Svedbergs bild
2011-12-01 (Comments)

It has probably escaped few that Russia will hold parliamentary elections this coming Sunday. It is, however, less well known that Croatians and Slovenians will go to the poll on the same day. And I would like to argue that the two Balkan elections will be more exciting.

Make no mistake, the election in Russia is far more important (and we will blog directly from Moscow early next week) but the surprise factor is likely low as the dominant pro-Kremlin United Russia party is expected to win comfortably again, thus confirming the status-quo.

The elections in Croatia and Slovenia are expected to result in new governments as the incumbents are expected to lose or need to find coalition partners. The political climate is rather complicated and the stakes are high.

The centre-right HDZ governing party in Croatia, which successfully completed the EU negotiations earlier this year, is smeared by a corruption scandal opening the door for a coalition of centre-left opposition parties.


The Croatian parliament building

Slovenian politics, meanwhile, have been deadlocked for months and the snap election was called after the centre-left government lost its parliamentary support after failing to push through a reform package. The election is likely to be a close call though and will most likely lead to a coalition government.

Rating agencies, which has downgraded sovereign rating over the political crisis and lack of reforms, are likely to watch the elections closely. The bond yields are already high and Ljubjana would have to pay dearly for not solving the impasse.

The biggest uncertainty in Moscow is voter turnout and how big a majority United Russia will get. It is not trivial as a low turnout and/or an indecisive majority could put the legitimacy of the tandem rulers into question. 

(Comments) | Taggar: Croatia, election, Russia, Slovenia, United Russia
Marcus Svedbergs bild
2011-11-03 (Comments)

Russia has been finalizing the accession negotiations for WTO members in the shadows of the Eurozone crisis and the G20 meeting. This is obviously very positive news for Russia and its trading partners.

We have been predicting (and hoping) that Russia would overcome the remaining obstacles this fall and finally join the world trade organization after 18 long years of negotiations. The last issue on the table was related to customs monitoring between Russia and Georgia, which proved very difficult to agree upon after the conflict back in 2008, but the parties have now reached a compromise agreement after talks in Geneva.

The exact details are unclear and a formal decision will probably be announced in a couple of days, but this should clear the way for an approval of Russian accession in a WTO meeting on 15 December.

This is obviously very positive news for Russia and its trading partners. Analysts, including myself, have grown weary over the years since the accession has been postponed so many times.

WTO accession is one of those win-win deals and the World Bank has estimated that GDP will be 3% higher in the medium term and 11% in the longer term in Russia (or roughly 1% per year) as a result of accession, primarily through gains in the services sector but also through improved market access abroad. The main upside may, however, be on sentiment as one of the Russian “discount factors” is removed.   

(Comments) | Taggar: GDP, Russia, WTO
Marcus Svedbergs bild
2011-10-11 (Comments)

Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko has been sentenced to seven years imprisonment for exceeding her powers in a gas deal with Russia back in 2009. This is bad news for Ukraine.

The court case against former Ukrainian Prime Minister YuliaTymoshenko, who is the opposition leader, has been heavily criticized and described as politically motivated.

As a convicted felon, Tymoshenko is not allowed to run in the parliamentary elections next year even if she would be set free. 

This is bad news for Ukraine and will complicate the situation for Prime Minister Yanukovych as both the EU and Russia, Ukraine’s two main trading partners, have criticized the case.

The EU has been protesting loudly lately and have threatened to withhold the important association agreement with Ukraine. The Russians have been less loud in their criticism but have put pressure on Kiev as the case suggests that Ukraine wants to renegotiate the deals reached between the two countries in 2009.

Ukrainian politics is not always straightforward but this is a clear lose-lose development.    

 

(Comments) | Taggar: court, Russia, Tymoshenko, Ukraine, Yanukovych
Marcus Svedbergs bild
2011-08-19 (Comments)

The Russian market and the Ruble (RUB) have attracted a lot of attention during the past month on the back of the global financial turmoil. Both the market and the currency tend to move with the oil price during times of global uncertainty.

One reason the RUB has been so flexible is because the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) has widened the trading corridor and thus tolerates more fluctuation before it intervenes. So, although the RUB dropped from below 33 in late July to almost 36 in early August, before coming back below 35), it stayed within CBR’s 32.25-37.25 range against the USD/EUR basket. The Urals oil price dropped from USD 117/bbl in mid July to 102 early last week before recovering to around 110 before selling off again yesterday.

The market seems to have overreacted though and discounted oil around USD 80/bbl. But assuming an actual oil price at USD 80, which seems bearish but not unrealistic given the deteriorating global economic outlook next year, we expect the Russian economy to be weak but stable with the RUB increasingly working as a shock absorber. This is a rather new and welcome phenomenon in Russia.

(Comments) | Taggar: currency, global economy, oil price, Ruble, Russia
Marcus Svedbergs bild
2011-03-23 (Comments)

The most recent statements by Russia’s tandem duo – President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin – have caused a new round of speculation of a possible schism between the two leaders. Such a division would indicate that they are no longer coordinated and are positioning themselves for the presidential election in March next year.

The political temperature has definitely been going up in Moscow lately and with it the level of uncertainty, but I am still not convinced about the above hypothesis as I believe the tandem leadership remains united. They simply need each other and seeming divisions can often be explained by the fact that they target different audiences and/or want to create an illusion of real competition. The current issue is illustrative. Medvedev authorised the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to not veto the UN resolution on Libya, a resolution Putin called a “medieval call for crusades”. Medvedev then rebuked Putin’s statement as unacceptable and said such words could “lead to a clash of civilisations.” We have heard similar seemingly contradictory statements from the duo before, for instance over WTO membership where Medvedev is positive while Putin argues for a customs union with Kazakhstan and Belarus (that is not consistent with WTO rules). 

Now, these kinds of statements should be analysed with the view that Medvedev is in charge of foreign relations and Putin handles domestic relations in mind. If Putin, who is still the most influential of the two, was truly against the resolution he could have pushed for a Russian veto. Apart from addressing different constituents, I believe they are quite happy to project a level of uncertainty (for the feuding elites domestically) and an impression of real political competition (for the foreign audience). But when the perception of these ulterior motives go too far, they make sure to display that they are, after all, united. The modus operandi is normally male bonding through eating, drinking or playing sports together. 

Any analysis of the Russian political leadership, including this one, should be taken with a large grain of salt though. Indeed, one of the problems with Russian politics is that the formal institutions are so weak and unpredictable that analysts are forced to rely on Kremlinology, or its contemporary art form Tandemology.

(Comments) | Taggar: medvedev, putin, Russia
Vesna Luccas bild
2011-02-18 (Comments)

Today we held the East Capital quarterly live Q&A with Peter Elam Håkansson, Head of the Portfolio Management team, and Marcus Svedberg, Chief Economist, to discuss the situation, outlook and opportunities in Russia that we are expecting to witness in 2011.

Assessing inflows into Russia, Peter highlighted how inflows of money have already increased this year. Contradicting the widespread assertion that investors are turning to the developed markets, Peter forecast a healthy outlook for emerging markets in 2011 and Russia in particular. The number of IPOs forecast will definitely broaden the opportunity for investors looking to move in to Russia. Peter acknowledged that pricing expectations of companies coming to market are looking aggressive at the moment, but he is expecting better pricing moving forward.

Focussing on the impact of a potential slow down of the China economy, Marcus explained that any change in China is bound to have an impact on sentiment concerning all emerging market economies, Russia amongst them. This is due to China now being such an important economy in global terms.

When queried on the inflation outlook for 2011, Marcus acknowledged that rates are currently high, due to the long lasting impact of 2010 summer droughts and wild fires affecting commodity prices. This will likely cause inflation to rise in the first half of the year, but it will drop down to single figures towards the end of 2011. Russia is used to dealing with high inflation, and since we are currently in a low inflationary environment, any rise in the coming months will not be enough to push Russia off track.

Discussion turned to the increasingly active consumer, since Russia has seen a 64% increase in retail and consumer spending in recent months. Peter explained that since few in Russia have a mortgage, the accessibility of affordable mortgages has triggered an increase in consumer spending. Peter identified the primary beneficiaries of this rise as the real estate development along with construction and materials industries.  Russia should continue to benefit from the ever expanding active middle class with their increased spending ability.

Looking ahead to the 2012 elections, Marcus forecast a continuation in the current ruling elite despite ongoing speculation on the outcome. This spells political stability for the country, which is good news for the extensive privatisation program currently being implemented. Heightened privatisation will be a key attraction to investors outside Russia, bringing in more capital flows.

All signals point to a positive outlook for Russia in 2011. Peter believes that people place too much risk on Russia, but already we are starting to see this opinion change. As ever with the country, the journey is complex but Russia is certainly moving in the right direction.

The next Q&A will take place on the 29th March, and will focus on China. We encourage you to put this date in your diary and look forward to updating you on yet another exciting investment region.

(Comments) | Taggar: East Capital Live Q&A, inflation, interest rate, Russia
Peter Elam Håkanssons bild
2011-01-12 (Comments)

The month of December started off well for Russia (as well as Qatar). The countries were both chosen to host the FIFA World Cup, in 2018 and 2022 respectively. This means that a large number of necessary infrastructure projects will be carried out all over Russia.

“Our” region now has a number of large and important sporting events to look forward to that will stimulate infrastructure investments; the Euro 2012 in Poland and Ukraine, the Winter Olympics 2014 in Sochi, Russia and now the World Cup 2018. Those of us who travel around the region have many improvements to look forward to in terms of new airport terminals, more selections of hotels and better train connections. Not so bad…

Another interesting event was Pepsi Co’s bid for Wimm-Bill-Dann. The bid of USD 3.8 billion for 66% of the shares is a significant signal from one of America’s “classic” multinationals that Russia is a market that cannot be ignored. If we add that Pepsi is also planning to bid for the outstanding minority shares as soon as approval is granted, we reach the considerable amount of USD 5.4 billion. This is a large investment money and if we also consider that Pepsi already has a large operation in the country, it is apparent that our optimistic view on Russia, and the fast growing consumption within the extensive middle class, is shared by Pepsi.

Russia will now be the single largest foreign market for Pepsi (previously Mexico), and by a wide margin compared to the other BRIC countries. Pepsi will also reach a combined market share of over 50% in the juice sector, as it is already a significant player in this market. It is also interesting to note that Coca-Cola holds the number two position on the Russian juice market with approximately 35% market share.

Both of these companies have realised that the Russian consumer consumes much more than consumers in many other emerging markets. This is explained by the fact that the Russians have a comparatively higher income per capita and therefore private consumption has really taken off.

Wimm-Bill-Dann is an interesting part of Russian industrial history. The name is a transcription of Wimbledon; they simply looked for a name that sounded international. This was important for success when the company was established in 1992. Following the Russian crisis in 1998, focus in the market shifted to Russian names and Wimm-Bill-Dann started a number of Russian brands, which demonstrated a good ability to understand the Russian consumer. The stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 2002, long before the listing in Moscow, and has since been one of the important holdings in East Capital’s Russian portfolio; completely in line with our strategy to look for exposure to domestic consumption. We will certainly miss this stock but we also see a continuous flow of new Russian companies focused on local consumption to the stock exchange.

Peter Elam Håkansson
Written on flight LH 452 (Lufthansa) between Munich and Los Angeles   

(Comments) | Taggar: FIFA world cup, Pepsi, Russia
Peter Elam Håkanssons bild
2010-11-12 (Comments)

In last month’s newsletter I wrote about our long-term perspective within fund management and the returns this can provide; to be persistent day in and day out for many years actually results in very impressive return figures per year.

Our Russian Fund and Eastern European Fund have provided 24% respective 23.4% in average returns since inception.

This period includes two of the largest falls in the stock market for the Russian Fund and one of the largest for the Eastern European Fund. Volatility has been extensive, but with a long-term perspective the returns have been very good, and a long-term perspective is exactly what pension savers should have. Therefore, we believe that these funds are well-suited for pension savings. Imagine our surprise during the year when we read in various Swedish advertising campaigns that it is better to have an annual consistent return of 4% than 24%. It is obvious that this cannot be the case. It is only beneficial to invest in a fund with a low absolute return if you would like to withdraw the entire savings precisely during a year when the stock market has fallen. Furthermore, it is reasonable to assume that those who are saving for their retirement do not want to withdraw their entire savings on the day that he or she retires, but instead choose to receive payments for many years to come.

Unfortunately, there are many people who do not understand this, which means that they have yet to start saving in the fast growing economies in the world. Only a small portion of the world’s pension funds are invested in Emerging Markets. One study of British pension funds showed that less than 5% of equity investments are in so called Emerging Markets. Today Emerging Markets equals 13.1% of index, which is a strong increase compared to the level ten years ago. At the end of 2002 the level was 3.8%. Thus, British pension savers today are already considerably underweight in the fastest growing parts of the world, which does not serve them well.

Don’t wait too long to correctly invest your pension for the best future development.

Peter Elam Håkansson
Written on flight SQ 352 (Singapore Airlines) between Singapore and Copenhagen.

(Comments) | Taggar: pension, Russia, Russian Fund

Om bloggen

Långsiktighet och lokal närvaro är grunden för East Capitals investeringsfilosofi. I den här bloggen vill vi dela med oss av aktuella insikter från Östeuropa & Kina och dess investeringsklimat. Engelska är gemensamt för de flesta av våra investerare och är därför det främsta språket för blogginläggen.

Bloggpolicy

East Capitals blogg är avsedd som en kontaktyta mellan webbplatsens besökare och företrädare för East Capital. Det är viktigt att uppmärksamma att uttalanden som görs av företrädarna för East Capital inte nödvändigtvis utgör East Capitals officiella ståndpunkt. Under inga omständigheter ska uttalanden på bloggen uppfattas som investeringsrådgivning och East Capital är inte ansvarigt för någon skada eller förlust som någon av webbplatsens besökare eller annan orsakas genom att förlita sig på uttalanden på bloggen.

Även om East Capital inte kontrollerar de kommentarer som skickas in av användarna, förbehåller sig East Capital rätten att avstå från att publicera, fördröja publicering av, ta bort, flytta eller redigera användarkommentarer till bloggen. East Capital accepterar inte kommentarer som är oförskämda, hotfulla eller förolämpande. Användarna ska avstå från att skicka in kommentarer som inte har med bloggens ämne att göra, innehåller reklam eller har ett olagligt innehåll, eller kommentarer som det kan anses utgöra ett brott att publicera (exempel på sådana brott är insiderbrott, otillbörlig marknadspåverkan och intrång i annans immateriella rättigheter).

Genom att skicka in en kommentar till bloggen ger du East Capital en rätt att använda kommentaren, helt eller delvis, i East Capitals marknadsföring eller på annats sätt, utan att ge dig någon ersättning.
Om du är av uppfattningen att en kommentar har publicerats på bloggen i strid med denna bloggpolicy ber vi dig att anmäla detta till: blog [at] eastcapital [dot] com

Våra bloggare

  • Karine Hirns bild

    Partner och Chief Representative, Shanghai-kontoret. Karine bloggar om East Capital, våra fondprodukter och ger direktrapporter från Shanghai.

  • Marcus Svedbergs bild

    East Capitals chefekonom fokuserar på makroekonomi, analyser och omvärldshändelser som påverkar utvecklingen i regionen.

  • Vesna Luccas bild
    East Capitals kommunikationschef skriver främst om East Capital som företag och aktuella mediefrågor.
  • Kristina Sandklefs bild

    Kristina, makroekonom Asien, delar med sig av sina erfarenheter och analyserar trender och händelser som påverkar Kina.

Prenumerera på blogginlägg

Fyll i din e-postadress:

Login