Blogginlägg av Guest blogger - bne

Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-09-28 |

The landscape has changed completely as a result of the global economic crisis and in September Goldman Sachs released a report that recalibrates its classic 2001 paper that introduced the world to the idea of the Bric markets.

The equity market capitalisation of the emerging markets has exploded over the last 10 years, rising from $2 trillion in 2000 to about $14 trillion today. At the same time, the market capitalisation of the developed markets has only increased from $29 trillion a decade ago to $30 trillion now.

That statistic is shocking, since by all accounts it should have doubled: numerous studies have shown that the long-term average return from equity investments is about 8% - which means that if you invest $100 in stocks, it should double in value every 10 years or so, not end up at $103. If you count inflation into the equation, then you have actually lost money, which the developed markets did over the last decade.

Over the same period, emerging markets not only beat developed market investments hands down, they soared seven-fold: the same $100 invested in emerging markets would have been worth $700 at the end of the decade, according to Goldman's calculations.

Furthermore, Goldman says that while the pace of growth in the value of emerging stock markets will slow, they will still handsomely outpace those in the West: Goldman predicts that the value of developed equity markets will rise by half from $30 trillion today to $46 trillion in 2020, and slightly less than half in the following decade to reach $66 trillion by 2030. By 2030, the value of emerging stock markets will have reached $80 trillion and the world's financial centre of gravity will have shifted for good.

 

Taggar: BRIC, market capitalisation | 5114
5114
Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-09-10 |

East Capital became a little more eastern this year with the completion in June of the acquisition of Asia Growth Investors (AGI), whose funds centred on China will be rebranded as East Capital from January next year. 

"As investors in Russia and Eastern Europe, it's extremely important to understand the natural resource sector and the Chinese market is a very important part of that; we are also seeing more and more trade between Russia and China; and finally, the Chinese market itself is very exciting market and we see so much happening, the market is very worth looking at itself," Peter Elam Hakansson, chairman and founding partner of East Capital, explained the decision to acquire 100% of AGI. 

Gustav Rhenman, fund manager of AGI, laid out the opportunities that attracted East Capital to invest in this expansion: China has had an average annual growth rate of about 10% over past 30 years. If it maintains a 9% growth rate and the US a 3% growth rate over the next 10 years, its economy will be roughly same size as the US. Its industries are growing into the largest in the world – its car industry has already overtaken Japan's to become the largest and by 2020 is forecast to produce 40m cars; by 2020 it will dominate telecoms infrastructure. "Consumption is growing at 15-20% per year – that creates a fantastic framework for industries to grow in," said Rhenman.

By 2020, the Chinese equity markets could be the largest in the world; currently, Chinese stock markets account for 14% of global market cap, compared with Europe 25% and North America 35%.

Taggar: East Capital Summit | 4917
4917
Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-09-10 |

Turning to Ukraine, Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said the country, one of the worst hit by the global economic crisis, is certainly lagging behind the rest of the region in terms of the recovery, but is speeding up and is now on a "reasonable track."

The macro picture, which was blighted by the 15% contraction in GDP in 2009, is so much better that the country is now expected to post about 6% growth this year. The crisis has meant the current account deficit has almost been eliminated, while inflation will come in at less than 1% this year. 

The newfound stability in the political sphere since President Viktor Yanukovych assumed the presidency at the start of this year means an ambitious reform programme has been launched, but are the aims achievable? 

The first big test was the conclusion of a new agreement with the IMF on June 3, which is for $15bn for 2 ½ years, essentially giving the country $1.5bn per quarter. Importantly, this money won't be used to finance external deficits, but to help bring the budget deficit of 6.5% this year down to 3.5% next year and for the reform effort. 

A central part of the reform programme is to raise gas prices, which hitherto have been heavily subsidised and were a huge drag on the economy. They were raised 50% from August 1 and will be hiked another 50% from April 1. 

Other measures are a bank recapitalisation worth $5bn, far-reaching deregulation for business, which is especially crucial for the SME segment that suffers from a stifling bureaucracy. "It's quite substantial reform measures being undertaken in Ukraine, it's a strong agenda through problem area still exist," says Aslund. 

For one thing, the country needs more reform of the pension system, the expenditures for which stand at 18% of GDP, the highest in world. Ukraine has promised to cut this to 12% of GDP by 2014, but more needs to be done. There are no serious measures against corruption, and the privatisation programme promised will almost certainly see the assets go to favoured local businessmen. "It's no secret who will get what, it's not a question of open tenders," he said. "The oligarchs restored! The people who run Ukraine are those who own Ukraine."

Taggar: East Capital Summit | 4916
4916
Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-09-09 |

CEZ
Barbara Seidlova, head of investors relations at power utilities company CEZ, said the Czech company has decided to focus on EU candidate countries rather than in the less developed but higher growth markets of Russia and Ukraine. "The regulatory environment is difficult to operate in and the size of assets are a problem in those countries, so we have decided to focus rather on EU candidate countries," she said, adding that the continent is heading towards becoming one whole electricity market operating on the same grid.

Immofinanz
Eduard Zehetner, CEO and CFO of Austrian property investor Immofinanz, called the property market in Russia "drastically undervalued", where yields at shopping centres stand at 12.5% compared with Poland where they are 6.5%. "You cannot argue 600 basis points between Moscow and Katowice is right, the valuation gap will close," he said.

Regarding Immofinanz, which is only now emerging from a near-bankrupt situation in the aftermath of the crisis, Zehetner said the current share price of his firm, around 80 cents, is well up from the low of 25 cents, but is still some way below the net asset value. "The share price means that the Western Europe part of the business trades at the NAV, while you get the CEE business virtually for free at the current price."

Central European Media Enterprises
Central European Media Enterprises (CME) Petr Dvorak, senior vice president of broadcasting, said there is still a huge level of growth in the advertising market in the six emerging European countries in which it operates, where there are far better prospects than those markets further west.

Using figures to illustrate his point, he said total ad spend per capita in Western Europe is $248 but only $44 in CME's markets. "If you're a car maker or a manufacturer of consumer goods, it's much cheaper to do an ad here than in Germany and the growth potential is pretty high."

Regarding M&A opportunities, Dvorak said CME would certainly be interested if it could find an acquisition like the one it completed in Bulgaria, where it bought the number one player for about $400m.

Taggar: East Capital Summit | 4907
4907
Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-09-09 |

According to Andras Szalkai, member of the portfolio management team at East Capital, who kicked of the second day of the East Capital Summit in Prague on September 9, the four Visegrad countries – Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia – overall are more developed than elsewhere in Central and Eastern Europe, but there's still a catch-up wave for investors to ride.

"The overall development is higher than elsewhere in Eastern Europe, but there's still catch-up potential, as they are still below the EU15 average in terms of GDP/capita," said Szalkai, adding that these countries are not just looking to achieve the EU average but to achieve the level of their neighbours like Germany and Austria.

As such, strong foreign investment inflows are expected to continue. Wage levels are still significantly lower. German labour costs work out at €29.8 per hour, but that level is only €6.4 in Czech Republic and €4.1 in Slovakia. "There's a very large difference in labour costs so we will still see continued inflows," he said. 

Other attractive aspects are the favourable taxation – Czech and Slovaks have flat tax rates, so will Hungary from next year – the improving infrastructure and strong EU anchor means the investment environment is safe. 

Finally, there is still a lot of EU money flowing in to help these countries develop. Between 2007 and 2013, the EU has mandated that 20% of these countries' annual GDP will come in as EU funds.

Central European markets are the highest valued markets in the East Capital’s investment universe – Czech Republic market trades at 12.2x price/earnings, Poland at 12.4x, Hungary about 11x compared with Russia on about 7x. But the stock-picking asset manager still finds some companies with attractive valuations and a positive outlook, many of these in the small to mid-cap universe, to which the asset manager's Bering New Europe fund is dedicated.

Taggar: East Capital Summit | 4906
4906
Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-09-08 |

The Icelandic volcanic ash cloud put paid to East Capital's original plans to host its annual investor Summit in April this year, but Peter Elam Hakansson opened the Summit today to the over 100 delegates from more than 20 countries with a speech that spoke of "cautious optimism."

"Economies [in the CEE region] are going from recovery to solid growth, although at a more balanced and sustainable pace," he said. "One of the exciting themes is the catch-up process to Western Europe levels and we are getting back to that." 

Even so, Bengt Dennis, a former governor of the Swedish central bank who sits on East Capital's advisory committee, said "we are still not back to the future."

Dennis said that most markets are not back to full capacity; in many cases the markets are nearing growth rates of the past, but some are lagging and will take more time to get back there. He also said that while these economies look robust in the sense the statistics are strong, "domestic demand is still very, very weak and a real broad-based recovery will have to wait for a few reasons."

Those reasons include the need for continued tight fiscal policies to reduce debt and bring budget deficits down; unemployment is still high and job growth is slow; household balance sheets are weak; and demand for credit is still slow. "It will take time to correct the imbalances," he said.

For the investor, though, the important point is not to wait for that broad-based recovery to arrive and an economy running at full capacity before investing, because he or she will run the risk of missing out on the superior returns. "The stock market tends to be six to 12 months ahead of the real economy."

Within the region, Dennis pointed out that those countries that went into the downturn with a good track record of running their economies have tended to recover much quicker, Poland being a prime example, which with some good luck but also good policies managed to avoid going into recession. At the other extreme are the Baltic countries, whose economies had grown too fast with too many imbalances and so the recovery has been more drawn out.

Even so, the Baltics should take some credit for addressing the problems head on, especially Estonia, which adjusted quickly and is now due to join the euro from next year. "Latvia won’t be back to 2007 GDP growth levels until 2015 or so, there will be many lost years for Latvia," said Dennis.

Looking at Central Europe, some of the latest data is at levels that could be called "booming" – for example, industrial production growth numbers are strong partly because Germany is growing well, but also because of the low base, since output dropped so sharply during the crisis. "Domestic demand is still weak, though exports are growing quite briskly," said Svedberg.

By contrast, Turkey is one of the least export-dependent economies in the region but is benefiting from strong domestic demand from its young and growing population, which is driving the economy and the stock market is reaching all-time highs this year. "I can't help but be impressed by how Turkey has acted during the crisis," said Svedberg.

Taggar: East Capital Summit | 4890
4890
Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-09-08 |

Independent asset management firm East Capital kicked off its investor summit in Prague today, September 8, where an immediate emerging theme centred on the question of why, even after all the reforms and progress that have been made in Russia and the rest of Central and Eastern Europe over the past decade, are valuations still so low? And is this about to change?

10 years ago, Russia was still emerging from a financial crisis, a debt default and devaluation of the Ruble, but is today sitting on the world’s third largest foreign currency reserves, the state and indeed the average Russian is debt free, and the country's output of natural resources that the emerging world so desperately needs to fuel their economies is near an all-time high. 

Even so, the Russian market is trading on a price/earnings (PE) ratio of 7x, little changed from the 6x it was trading 10 years ago. Compare that with the other so-called Bric nations: the Brazil market, for example, is trading on a PE of 14x, yet its economy is just as dependent on commodities and its population is a lot less well educated and wealthy than in Russia. 

"Valuations today in Russia are the same as 10 years ago and many Eastern European markets have not really recovered from the crisis," said Peter Elam Hakansson, Chairman and Head of Portfolio Management at East Capital. "You do have to factor in the risk and volatility factor, but we think it's exaggerated right now." 

Jacob Grapengiesser, a partner of East Capital, said the dichotomy between what is happening on the ground and the perception in the minds of foreign investors marks a wide divide which will eventually be closed. And when sentiment reaches such a trend turning point, that's when the biggest gains can be made.

A sign of how that turning point might have been reached is when one looks over the past six months, the stories about Russia have definitely taken on a more positive tone. An example would be the way Russia behaved and was perceived to have behaved during the tragedy of the late Polish president's plane crash.

"The risk premiums are overstated and the market is too cheap," Grapengiesser said. "In our minds, the markets are misunderstood and risks are oversold."

East Capital’s funds have already benefited from the turning in sentiment toward the region over the decade leading up to the global economic crisis. Its Russian Fund returned 1,565% over the decade 2000-2009, the best-performing onshore regulated fund out of the roughly 94,000 other funds the average investor could have put his or her money in. Its nearest competitor returned 1,380%. Over the period, the Russian stock market was up about 780%, while an investor in the US market would have lost 26% and 5% in the European market. Elam Hakansson says, paradoxically, 2009 proved to be an excellent year for performance – its broad-based Eastern European fund outperformed the index by 23% - which is a function of East Capital's philosophy of hands-on investing rather than investing from afar. In 2009, the firm doubled the number of its local company visits. "We want to be out there seeing things for ourselves, not sitting in our offices."

One main reason why Russia and the rest of the region should be revalued is that in macro terms, overall the CEE region came out of the crisis in much better shape than Western Europe, which is heavily burdened by debt. While Russia may not match the 7-8% growth of past years, the 4-5% expected over the next few years is still considerably more than expected in Western Europe and the US.

Comparing Russia with Brazil again, Petrobras is currently carrying out a capital increase that values its oil in the ground at $8 per barrel; for Russian oil firms, it's $2.50. Not to mention of course that Petrobras' oil comes from  hard-to-get-at deepwater areas, while much of Russia's oil reserves being developed are found onshore.

"Lukoil, a well run private Russian oil firm is trading at a PE ratio of 5x, a third of that of Petrobras, and there's no good reason for that," Grapengiesser said.

As such, East Capital is predicting a shift in investment from Brazil to Russia.

Given Russia's prominence in the region, the negativity clouding investor sentiment inevitably has a spill-over effect into the other smaller markets in the region. Take Serbia, a country whose economy was marginally down last year: it is expected to grow this year, is attracting large amounts of foreign direct investment, yet its stock market is still down over 80% from its peak before the crisis. "Polish banks are trading at 2x book value, while Serbian banks are at just 0.3x book value and Russian banks 1.5x book value," Grapengiesser noted. "Serbia will get there eventually, whether in six months, one year or three years, but the trend is there."

Taggar: East Capital Summit | 4889
4889
Guest blogger - bnes bild
2010-05-06 |

business new europe 
May 6, 2010

Equity markets around the world, including Russia's, are tanking as the possibility of a Greek default looms. But unlike the global economic crisis that burnt the world's economy 18 months ago, this new crisis looks more like the run-up to Russia's 1998 financial crisis. That one was bad for Russia, but had a very short-lived impact on the rest of the world. This time round, Russia is on the other side of the fence as one of the strong countries that will encounter little more than a bump on the path that leads back to strong growth. 

I remember the start of 1998 well. Things were actually looking a lot better than at any time in the past. The economy had put in its first-ever positive (albeit anaemic) growth that year and the big news story was the upcoming merger between oil companies Yukos and Sibneft (owned by Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Boris Berezovsky, respectively) to form "Yuksi", which would have become the biggest oil company in the world. 

On the political front, Boris Yeltsin was more or less compos mentis for once and had just installed a raft of "young reformers" into senior positions in the government, including Sergei Kiriyenko and Boris Nemtsov, who were saying all the right things about finally cracking on with the job of real reform. And, most importantly, yields on government treasury bills, the GKO, had fallen into the low-teens, making the refinancing of the 8%-off budget deficit progressively easier. Indeed, things were looking so good that Swedish-based eastern European fund manager East Capital decided to launch its inaugural Russia fund in April of that year. 

Then it all blew up. 

The Asian currency crisis that happened a year before and wrecked the economies of the so-called Asian Tigers finally fed through into commodity prices, and oil prices in particular collapsed from about $25 a barrel to $10. I was on holiday that Easter as the first shock waves arrived and began to desperately rewrite the upbeat reports I had filed a few weeks before as things quickly spun out of control. Yields on GKOs soared to over 200% over the next month and Russia turned to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for loans (which were promptly stolen by well-connected bankers as the so-called "stabilisation loans" were immediately whisked offshore). 

It all came to a head on August 17, 1998 when the government called it quits. The ruble was cut to a quarter of its value and the government put a five-year moratorium on all international debt repayment as international reserves fell to a staggeringly small $9.1bn - about 2% of what they are today and hardly enough to cover the Kremlin's stationery bill. 

The reaction of the stock market was surprisingly out of sync with the bond market. Portfolio investors had already got the willies nine months earlier. The stock market hit its all-time high on October 6, 1997 when the RTS reached 571 (a bit more than the low of 492 hit in the depths of this crisis on January 23, 2009). By August 17, 1998, the index had fallen to 109, but oddly it took another month and a half to reach the bottom of 38.5 on October 5. The recovery was long, painful and volatile: the RTS didn't recover all the ground lost until almost exactly four years later when the RTS closed at 573 on October 1, 2003. 

Now history is repeating itself with Greece. A €110bn bailout deal has been struck between Germany and the other Eurozone members (despite the ban on bailouts in the euro treaty), which is due to be approved on May 7. But the bond markets in particular don't believe it will work and spreads on Greek bonds – like those on GKOs in 1998 – are widening rapidly. Worse, the collywobbles are spreading to other countries (especially the so-called Pigs of Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain) as rumours fly; it was reported that Spain has approached the IMF for a €280bn loan, among other things. 

Predictably, stock markets around the world have sold off heavily. In Russia, the RTS has dropped from its April high of around 1690 to about 1500 today, on May 5. Yields on bonds are also up as investors drop the riskier paper they were holding. 

If this "second wave" plays out like that in 1998, the spreads will kill any chance that Greece's bailout package has of working, as the cost of borrowing soars and Athens will be forced to withdraw from the Eurozone, immediately devaluing the drachma in order to put its financial house in order. Driving this fear is the experience of Argentina, which tried to impose too severe an austerity programme in 2001 and subsequently collapsed, as news media are gleefully remind everyone. In Russia's case, the fear is that the collapse of Greece will suppress the nascent recovery and depress oil prices and so, at best, take the wind out of Russia's sails; at worst, cause a real second wave of financial instability. 

But what would really happen if Greece does go phut?

Bric'd up 

The first thing to note is that unlike the global collapse in September 2008, this time the problems are more regional rather than global. In this sense, the current problems are very like 1998 when the Asian collapse led to the Russian collapse, while in the rest of the world it remained business as usual. Remember that at the same time as these regions were melting down the US and Western Europe were enjoying the heady excesses of the dotcom bubble that didn't deflate until 2000 (ironically, the year Russia put in its strongest growth on record). The health of the rest of the world allowed Russia's economy to bounce back a lot more quickly than otherwise, as it had global markets to cater to. 

The same is true now. Although European and US growth is sluggish, they are both growing, but this time round there are the new growth markets of Brazil, India and China (which with Russia make up the Bric countries) to take up the slack and provide Russia with the markets it needs to hold up commodity exports, among other things. 

There is also clearly a disconnect between what is happening on Russia's stock market and what is happening in the economy. Crises do a lot of damage to emerging markets, but thanks to the very underdevelopment of those markets, these crises are a lot less "sticky." We have made this point before - for example, the average debt of the average Russian is on the order of $900, whereas the same for the average American is over $40,000; a Russian who loses his job in a crisis can scrape together enough money to pay off his debts from friends and family, whereas if an American loses his job, he is in real trouble. 

Russia's economic recovery is gaining momentum fast. Just looking at data from today, we have: Avtovaz domestic sales of its Lada-brand vehicles jumped 54% in April versus the same month last year; in April there were a record high number of transactions on the Moscow residential market, growing 66% on year; from January to April, Russian gas exports nearly doubled from the same period in 2009; overall oil production was more or less flat, but production from greenfield sites in the new eastern Siberian territories is soaring and already accounts for 6% of Russia's total oil production, says VTB Capital; and a slew of companies have been reporting double-digit gains in earnings over the last few weeks as businesses recover. 

More generally, the Ministry of Economics reports the average price for oil this year so far is about $76 per barrel, well ahead of the $58 assumed in the budget, and so it has upgraded its growth forecast to 4% for the whole year, while the investment banks are predicting up to 8% growth in the second half of the year. And the VTB Manufacturing PMI index, which measures business activity, is up too, indicating solid growth in the real sector. 

And this is also true in Russia's developed peers: the Eurozone PMI is at a 46-month high of 57.5 (compared with 56.6 in March, while 50 represents no change) and the US ISM Manufacturing Index is back over 60 again (at 60.4) for the first time since June 2004, says VTB Capital. Likewise car sales in the US, China and Japan are all up by 65-75% over the first quarter; housing starts in the US are up 20%; and both of these have been feeding a surge in production in commodities like steel, which is now at a record high. 

All this will prop up Russia if Greece defaults. But analysts mostly agree that a bust is unlikely, as between the Germans and the IMF some sort of solution will be found. Nobody wants to see the Eurozone break apart. "We recognise that the Greek situation is evolving along the lines of Russia's 1998 economic crisis; indeed, the fiscal parameters of Greece's situation are worse than that, but they also have a greater political imperative of financial aid from the Eurozone playing to their benefit, at least for now. And the endgame might be very similar, ie. an eventual default on Greece's sovereign debt triggered by the country's inability to meet the conditionality attached to the package. That said, the experience of the 1998 Russian crisis suggests that the contagion from such a credit event, while significant, would be short-lived," Wiktor Bielski, an analyst with VTB Capital said in a note today. 

VTBC is keeping its forecast for the RTS to top 2000 by the end of this year, but admits that it could take a little longer to get there than they thought when they set the target in early May.

Taggar: bne, Guest blog | 3526
3526

NYHETER FRÅN ÖSTEUROPA & ASIEN
I samarbete med vår mediepartner bne, ett ledande medieföretag som följer hela East Capitals investeringsområde.

Om bloggen

Långsiktighet och lokal närvaro är grunden för East Capitals investeringsfilosofi. I den här bloggen vill vi dela med oss av aktuella insikter från Östeuropa & Kina och dess investeringsklimat. Engelska är gemensamt för de flesta av våra investerare och är därför det främsta språket för blogginläggen.

Bloggpolicy

East Capitals blogg är avsedd som en kontaktyta mellan webbplatsens besökare och företrädare för East Capital. Det är viktigt att uppmärksamma att uttalanden som görs av företrädarna för East Capital inte nödvändigtvis utgör East Capitals officiella ståndpunkt. Under inga omständigheter ska uttalanden på bloggen uppfattas som investeringsrådgivning och East Capital är inte ansvarigt för någon skada eller förlust som någon av webbplatsens besökare eller annan orsakas genom att förlita sig på uttalanden på bloggen.

Även om East Capital inte kontrollerar de kommentarer som skickas in av användarna, förbehåller sig East Capital rätten att avstå från att publicera, fördröja publicering av, ta bort, flytta eller redigera användarkommentarer till bloggen. East Capital accepterar inte kommentarer som är oförskämda, hotfulla eller förolämpande. Användarna ska avstå från att skicka in kommentarer som inte har med bloggens ämne att göra, innehåller reklam eller har ett olagligt innehåll, eller kommentarer som det kan anses utgöra ett brott att publicera (exempel på sådana brott är insiderbrott, otillbörlig marknadspåverkan och intrång i annans immateriella rättigheter).

Genom att skicka in en kommentar till bloggen ger du East Capital en rätt att använda kommentaren, helt eller delvis, i East Capitals marknadsföring eller på annats sätt, utan att ge dig någon ersättning.
Om du är av uppfattningen att en kommentar har publicerats på bloggen i strid med denna bloggpolicy ber vi dig att anmäla detta till: blog [at] eastcapital [dot] com

Våra bloggare

  • Karine Hirns bild

    Partner och Chief Representative, Shanghai-kontoret. Karine bloggar om East Capital, våra fondprodukter och ger direktrapporter från Shanghai.

  • Marcus Svedbergs bild

    East Capitals chefekonom fokuserar på makroekonomi, analyser och omvärldshändelser som påverkar utvecklingen i regionen.

  • Vesna Luccas bild
    East Capitals kommunikationschef skriver främst om East Capital som företag och aktuella mediefrågor.
  • Kristina Sandklefs bild

    Kristina, makroekonom Asien, delar med sig av sina erfarenheter och analyserar trender och händelser som påverkar Kina.

Prenumerera på blogginlägg

Fyll i din e-postadress:

Login